Dissolve into Evergreens
|
||||
In and Around Tulsa Town (no political content) ... GAAAH!!! I just puked in my space helmet! www.mnft... ACLU too Mr. Limbaugh WorldNetDaily: ACLU comes t... I'm Quoting Yar Again. Yar's Revenge: "Personal... Freak Show American Politics Journal -- Cro-Magno... Dinner Plans Mollie Katzen Online: "SESAME-PEANUT... Bush Loving Jake of countersink seems to think th... You're Hungry Again? OpinionJournal - Best of the... Tax and Borrow Current Budget Projections So why... Guess Who? ZNet | Iraq | Selective Memory and Fal... Justin Oldham - Politics and Patriotism
Wilco The Flaming Lips The New Radicals John Mayer Zero 7 Dream Theater Radiohead Death Cab for Cutie The Notwist O.S.I. Ani Difranco The Shins Elliott Smith Badly Drawn Boy Chroma Key Coheed and Cambria The Streets Andrew Bird Sufjan Stevens Atom Site Feed |
1.18.2004
But Aren't We Safer? As much as it may make us feel all warm and fuzzy inside to think that toppling Saddam magically solved our WMD-Terrorist problem its simply not the case. Hopefully there are some people that realize this and with luck they'll get a couple of bucks thrown their way to do work that does actually make us safer. U.S. Officials Try to Trace Illegal Sale of Nuclear Technology: "Asher Karni, an Israeli who lives in South Africa, was arrested in Denver earlier this month on charges that he had illegally exported the devices to Pakistan without a license. In court documents, the American authorities charge that Mr. Karni, 50, was at the center of a global operation that used front companies and false billing records to route the trigger devices from a private manufacturer in Salem, Mass., to South Africa, the United Arab Emirates and ultimately Pakistan. " 'Cuz you see the people that want this technology to build the nasty weapons don't care where it comes from. The primary middlemen will most likely not be your fanatics but profit seeking opportunists. States will be the main purchasing agents and they will do so for the sane reason that it will give them leverage. But while we really shouldn't worry too much about states themselves, for they will most likely see it as a bargaining tool first, we should be worried that in the process of the transfer they will pass through some pretty sleazy hands. States desire more leathal weapons because it gives them diplomatic leverage. Look at what a first rate military capable of toppling governments can mean to your ability to dictate world policy. I think we overlook the potential dangers of Pakistan and Suadi Arabia at our own risk. | |
About Me
Any Box |
||
Dissolve into Evergreens
|