Dissolve into Evergreens
This blog used to be about politics. Not so much anymore as I have worked through my fascination with that subject. It now seems appropriate that with a new president and the end of the Bush nightmare that I move on to new subjects that are more in line with my current interests. I may still occasionally express an opinion about political matters but for the most part I will be commenting on music, photography and personal observations. Thank you for reading.


Current Playlist

Top 100 in iTunes

juscuz's Last.fm Overall Artists 

Chart




Atom Site Feed

B4 d- t k s u- f i- o x-- e- l- c+

Blogarama


< ? Colorado Blogs # >

« - ? Blog Oklahoma * # + »
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
9.27.2005
another city that starts with d
 
i'm spending a little time in denver on a sort of vacation. I'm not getting paid for it, but I think I'll survive being away from work for a little while.

needless to say this is one of those "i'll be blogging lightly" posts which I know we all hate so much.

been out to rocky mountain national park already and it was as beautiful as ever. i'd been there once before and it had snowed. this time is was nice and sunny and we got to take the road that traverses the park.

i'm hanging out in a nice little burb of denver called highlands ranch. very posh. it kinda feels like a big outdoor mall.

today I took a litle drive up and down colorado blvd just to get a better feel for what the city looks like; very interesting. denver looks like a fun place to be.

hey look, its the mountains... and you thought that was just a marketing thing...

i've been relegated to sitting in a starbucks typing this. i eventually get that guilty "maybe i should get some coffee" feeling.

but i resist, at least until i get sleepy.

|
9.25.2005
Wilco
 
Good.

Very Good.

Very Very Good.

|
9.21.2005
what to do?
 
Lawmakers Prepare Plans to Finance Storm Relief - New York Times:
"The list also proposed eliminating the Moon-Mars initiative that NASA announced on Monday,"


So you might be wondering, why don't they just announce a $500 billion program to give everyone free health care.... then cut it?

It would pay for the reconstruction, plus sound really conservative; Operation Now You See It Now You Don't

Rob @ Emphasis Added echoes my own thoughts on the "reconstruction".

Personally, I believe that investment in physical infrastructure is, dollar for dollar, the best money government can spend. Under any other circumstances, I would tend to view the Gulf Coast disaster and the unity of public response to it as an unprecedented opportunity to redevelop one of the poorest areas of the country. Done right, the Gulf could become a showplace for all the good ideas 21st century engineering has to offer – not just in terms of levees and flood control systems, but in traffic management, housing, urban planning, environmentally-sound development, public transit, and cultural infrastructure. But who among us is fool enough to entertain that dream?


Not me. I got burned once before.

Post 9-11 I thought we had a golden opportunity to think about our oil dependence and the relationships we've had with countries who provide that oil for us. Our politicians had some political capital to work with. People would have been open to addressing some real issues thought unimportant before. Instead we got "They hate us because of our freedom!", flag waving, and plans for revenge.

So here we are four years later and another tragedy once again illustrates just how vulnerable we are to disruptions in the oil supply, and I keep thinking "Maybe its time to rethink how we organize our society?"

The problem seems quite obvious. We're becoming more and more dependent on a resource that is becoming more scarce; a resource that we must seek from others. Its gone beyond mere environmental arguments (though those still exist) to one of economics. We're building a bridge across an infinite chasm, as long as we have more boards we can keep going, but once those boards are gone, we're out in the middle of nowhere and ready to fall. We have little or no backup plan.

Here we have a chance to prepare at least one city for the eventual changes that are coming. But I feel that pressure from entrenched interests will subvert any good plan. We have people in government who don't even believe in government's usefulness. We might just get one big giveaway program disguised as a reconstruction effort.

How did we end up in this mess?

Gas prices are starting to fall and people are going to forget that even when prices were over three dollars a gallon most people only had two options, pay the higher prices, or not drive at all. Driving is not an optional activity for most people. We still have to get to work. Where were the options? In a country that seems to be drowing in consumer choices, from dozens of types of toothpaste to an entire aisle devoted to breakfast cereals, we still have very few transportation options.

|
9.18.2005
welcome over the fence
 
The Subjective Scribe:
"Disclaimer: I am not a Democrat. I am a recovering Republican who is now a registered Independent."


Well, it would nice if it worked that way. But once you find yourself on "the other side", even though your original goal was impartiality, you will be lumped in with the enemies of "the conservative cause".

But I suspect scribe already knows this.

I began to recognize that the Republican party had become one giant, powerful political machine that demanded unquestioning loyalty and adherence to the party line. It was more interested in vanquishing its foes (both foreign and domestic, strategic and political) than in the long-term interests of the nation. Pride and self-interest seemed to eclipse sound reason and objective awareness. Nationalism usurped brotherhood with our fellow man in this world.


yup. Party before principle, party before nation, party before the lives of fellow Americans.

How quickly people find themselves on the other side of the republican machine for simply exercising their conscience.

I don't consider myself a democratic loyalist in the least bit. I would rather see more options. But I have to admit freely that voting for a Republican at this time does not seem like an option in the light of how that party has behaved.

|
9.17.2005
hello?
 
Herald Sun: Renee: My marriage was a fraud [18sep05]:
"According to friends, Zellweger was charmed by his [Kenny Chesney's] admission that he wrote his best known hit, You Had Me At Hello, after seeing her in the film Jerry Maguire."


great.

|
9.16.2005
Commander in Confidence
 
ABC News: Bush Rules Out Tax Hike to Fund Recovery:

"'You bet it's going to cost money. But I'm confident we can handle it and I'm confident we can handle our other priorities, It's going to cost whatever it costs.'"


Bush is confident. What more could we ask for?

You remember, he was pretty sure we'd find weapons in Iraq? And he had an inkling that we would catch Osama Bin Laden Dead or Alive?

Sure, he might have been a little cautious when he said his tax cuts would lead to economic recovery?

Forgive, forgive...!!!

This time he's confident that we can spends billions on reconstruction and billions in Iraq and everything will just magically work itself out for the best...

You've got to admit though...

He's 100% certain that if we don't hand over our Social Security to Wall Street we're going to be in deep economic shit.

|
9.14.2005
important details
 
New York Daily News - City News - Man on fire leaps off Tappan Zee & lives; pal killed:
"But before the driver - Angel Norales, 41, also of the Bronx - or Arzu could hail help, their vehicle was slammed by a tractor-trailer carrying pasta that changed lanes and didn't see the stalled car, according to police."


|
not right, do it again
 
Earlier today i wrote this:

"Some ideas are so good that we need to try and fail at them over and over again; mainly because they benefit the right people."

Bush Takes Responsibility For Failures Of Response:

"Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.), a Bush ally, said the recovery effort provides conservatives with an unusual opportunity to test ideas that have been hard to sell on a national scope, including vouchers to cover education for dislocated students and tax incentives for business investment. 'There are a whole host of ideas being looked at,' Kyl said."


Oh goodie... let's try it again shall we?

Behind the scenes, the president's inner circle is working with more than a dozen new task forces, run through the domestic policy counsel, to solicit ideas from federal agencies and outside groups such as the Heritage Foundation and American Enterprise Institute.


They've already suspended wage laws for construction workers getting federal contracts and now they're looking to suspend wage supports for service workers as well.

Other great ideas include waiving environmental regulations and creating low tax zones for business.

Its like a little slice of the third world right on our back door.


|
pay to play
 
mission accomplished

House Majority Leader Tom DeLay said yesterday that Republicans have done so well in cutting spending that he declared an "ongoing victory," and said there is simply no fat left to cut in the federal budget.

Mr. DeLay was defending Republicans' choice to borrow money and add to this year's expected $331 billion deficit to pay for Hurricane Katrina relief. Some Republicans have said Congress should make cuts in other areas, but Mr. DeLay said that doesn't seem possible.


Sometimes you really have to wonder...

Open your copies of the newspeak dictionary:

fat: spending on the poor.

What I think Delay meant to say was that the tremendous sums reserved for political cronies and payoffs is a political neccesity.

"Its our pork, no touchie!!"

Maybe what he's saying is true though? Maybe we've cut the useful government to the bone and all that is left is the machine of federal corporate welfare?

All the "bad government" (aka social programs) is nearly gone and all we have left is the "good government" (aka huge military spending and pork projects to help get politicians reelected).

Never mind that we are spending more than ever and borrowing at breakneck rates. Nothing is too much to keep incumbents in power?

Strangly, one of the more astute observations made in the post-Katrina outpouring of opinions was made by The Rude Pundit (as seen at Steve Gilliard's).

So when Barbara Bush grits her teeth to say that poor blacks have it better off in a hurricane shelter than at home and when O'Reilly and Will say that poor blacks need education, there's one thing they're leaving out: what are we gonna do about it? O'Reilly goes the idiot's route (which, to say about Bill O'Reilly, is to say that cats know where the litter box is so they can shit there) by saying that government cannot solve people's problems, but, you know, government provides education, which, if you work in the realm of logic, seems to indicate that government can solve problems. Will, on This Week With George Stephanopolous's Hair, spouted on that America has had poverty programs for years. Problem is, of course, the Great Society's poverty programs only lasted for a decade and a half before Reagan came in and gutted the living shit out of them. Since then, we've had piecemeal poverty support in America, at best.


Some ideas are so good that we need to try and fail at them over and over again; mainly because they benefit the right people. Other programs are declared dead on arrival because they threaten to actually reverse inequality.

Ok, one more time, let's try giving the rich people huuuuge tax breaks and see if that makes the economy work better.

nope?

ok, one more time. Maybe if we invested Social Security in the stock market?

President Reagan is adored by the stupid right simply for declaring our efforts to alleviate poverty a bust and giving huge wads of cash to the rich. The stupid right thought that Bush would be their useful idiot and go even further. And they were right to a certain degree. If you look at the policy agenda for W. you'll see huge tax cuts for the rich, repeal of the estate tax and a plundering of social security high up on the list.

Even now, as the consequences of years of neglect are becoming obvious, as we watch the plight of America's left behind, our brave politicians are pushing to repeal the estate tax, a move that would hurt charities but help establish a permanent aristocracy in America.

Class warfare is ongoing. We are counting the casualities in New Orleans.

Maybe Tom Delay is right? Maybe we've reached a Republican utopia wherein all government spending goes towards helping the politicians and their well connected friends and people no longer see their government as useful?

|
9.11.2005
more tribalism
 
Whittle's (have a told you I'm a pilot yet?) tribe:

"'He looked all of us in the eye and said, 'I swear to you, there are buses waiting across the bridge,' ' Mr. Bradshaw said.

But on the bridge there were four police cruisers parked across some lanes. Between six and eight officers stood with shotguns in their hands, the witnesses said. As the crowd approached, the officers shot over the heads of the crowd, most of whom retreated immediately, Mr. Bradshaw, Ms. Slonsky and Ms. Golden and her son said."


Then you have the comfort of blaming the victims for not taking the initiative to find dry land and something to eat. Its not just about race, but class as well.

Let me tell you how I would have done it...

|
9.10.2005
Faulty Thinking and Lack of Perspective
 
Glenn Beck -- major league prick:
"Yesterday, when I saw the ATM cards being handed out, the $2,000 ATM cards, and they were being handed out at the Astrodome. And they actually had to close the Astrodome and seal it off for a while because there was a near-riot trying to get to these ATM cards. My first thought was, it's not like they're going to run out of the $2,000 ATM cards."


umm... or maybe these people understood how things work in the government, getting screwed over at the drop of a hat?

Today.

The federal government’s relief agency said Friday it will discontinue its program to distribute $2,000 debit cards to hurricane victims and use bank deposits instead, two days after hastily announcing the novel plan to provide quick relief.


If you, like normal people, have a functioning sense of perspective you might realize why it would be a whole lot better to have an ATM card than trying to get a direct deposit.

The "scumbags" (Glen's word, not mine) rushing to get those ATM cards don't seem so stupid now do they?

But if being right was Glen's job he'd not be on the air long. He's there, sad to say, to fuel a certain sense of self-righteousness and to deliver a political point of view.

But shit, how do your explain the sheer levels of self-delusion that inflict some people?

Witness Bill Whittle:

Well, here’s the news flash: Nagin isn’t incompetent because he’s black. He’s incompetent because he’s incompetent. Condoleeza Rice is black. Colin Powell is black. Ted Kennedy, a man well-acquainted with rising water crises is as white as they come. Kennedy is incompetent; Rice and Powell are two of the most competent people on the planet.


Rice was National Security Advisor leading up to 9-11, didn't think that the threat of a terrorist attack on American soil was worthy of attention: The memo of August 6, 2001.

We have not been able to corroborate some of the more sensational threat reporting, such as that from a ---- service in 1998 saying that Bin Laden wanted to hijack a U.S. aircraft to gain the release of "Blind Sheikh" Omar Abdel Rahman and other U.S.-held extremists.

Nevertheless, FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York.

The FBI is conducting approximately 70 full-field investigations throughout the U.S. that it considers bin Laden-related. CIA and the FBI are investigating a call to our embassy in the UAE in May saying that a group or bin Laden supporters was in the U.S. planning attacks with explosives.


I understand human failings, but I would hardly confer the title of "competant" to someone that, when forewarned of a threat with fairly specific information responds to criticism with:

To the best of my knowledge, Mr. Chairman, this kind of analysis about the use of airplanes as weapons actually was never briefed to us.


Or would I refer to someone as "competant" who took disputed evidence of an Iraqi WMD program to the United Nations to present them as known facts.

back to Whittle's widdle world:

On the subject of disasters man-made and natural, one more thing from INSIDE 9/11 rings a powerful bell with me. At the very end, as Osama makes his way out of Afghanistan and into hiding, he tells an Al Jazeera reporter his motivations for the 9/11 attack. In his own words, to the friendly folks back home, he explains that his goal was to hurt America so badly that we would have no choice but to go after him and start the world-wide jihad that would result in him becoming the new Caliph, ruling from his recently completed palace outside Kandahar. He had seen much of the Pink tribe in his formative years, seen weakness and retreat in places like Somalia. He thought he had our number but he made the mistake of having perhaps the least Pink individual in modern history in the White House. He made a worse mistake in flying his murdering deathbots into a town that looked Pink, that was painted Pink from head to toe, but whose foundation was rock-solid granite Grey.


quickie translation: grey people are people who strut and talk tough and pink people are all those people that Whittle personally finds distasteful.

I suppose that if I were to see the world with the help of the Super Secret Decoder Ring and thought that there was a real connection between strutting like a peacock and being a competant person I might agree with his assessment.

But I've worked in the real world for far too long to confuse the two. Whittle, convinced of his own manly alpha-tribe (did I mention I'm a pilot yet?) status goes on to construct a convoluted logic as to why doing exactly what Osama Bin Laden wanted was the right decision even though it has led to no appreciable benefits for the United States.

But I do know, that there, in his own words, the wolf said why he did what he did: he wanted to provoke War with the US, and would do whatever was necessary to accomplish it. And if we had not given him this war, he would have kept striking until he got what he was looking for. Nothing about US foreign policy, no word about injustice for the Palestinians or Evil Corporations or any of that. No, he said he wanted to start a war with the US. And so he has it. And he would have done whatever he had to do to get it.


huh?

Don't think about it too hard, because, had we not "started a war" Whittle would be explaining how rewarding the terrorists by giving them what they wanted was the wrong decision and would have led to more terrorism.

Do I even need to mention that President Concrete Grey has been a failure at nearly everything he has ever been involved in, failing upwards in a system of affirmitive action for the rich and the useful? I hope not.

But that's all irrelavant when you've constructed a useful fantasy to justify your own exceptionalism and to condemn those that you look down upon.

I've never been much of a joiner and I have little use for tribes. Eventually you end up having to defend faulty groupthink with silly analogies involving wolves, sheep and the colors pink and grey.

Let me tell you how I would have done it...

|
9.09.2005
Poor Brownie
 


Brownie sent back to Washington:

"Critics say his only real qualification for Fema was to have been a friend of the previous director, Joe Allbaugh"


But who the fuck is Joe Allbaugh?

Bush's 2000 campaign manager.

Just how does that make him qualified to deal with disasters?

Maybe if he had been Gore's campaign manager...

|
9.07.2005
top 15
 
at least according to my page at Last.fm

1 Elliott Smith
2 Modest Mouse
3 John Vanderslice
4 Beck
5 Wilco
6 Okkervil River
7 Badly Drawn Boy
8 Fiona Apple
8 Aberfeldy
10 Death Cab for Cutie

-----

11 Nick Drake
12 Rilo Kiley
13 Coheed and Cambria
14 The Postal Service
15 Jack Johnson

some new cds recently purchased:

Death Cab for Cutie : Plans -- 7/10
John Vanderslice : Pixel Revolt -- 6/10
The Arcade Fire : Funeral -- 8/10

nothing too amazing just yet, but we still have a new Coheed and Cambria coming out on Sept. 20th. Opening up their site will start a preview of one of their new songs, Welcome Home.

|
time and distance
 
its all in how you measure it I guess?

0 eons away
0 centuries away
0 decades away
0 years away
0 months away
2 weeks away
14 days away
336 hours away
+20,000 minutes away

0 universes away
0 galaxies away
0 solar systems away
0 planets away
0 continents away
2 states away
721 miles away
3,806,880 feet away
45,682,560 inches away

|
9.06.2005
i was wrong
 
Every once in a while I like to fall on my own sword, just because I am reminded that at one point in time I was very very wrong about something.

I used to say, back in the good ol' days during the 2000 election that there wasn't that much difference between Bush and Gore.

That's right.. I said that.

I'm so sorry.

In hindsight, and I know that's a poor excuse, I now realize that all those people who pointed out that a competent politician with a slightly uneven track record of supporting liberal issues would be better than a complete boob who would turn our nation's government into a bumbling band of incompetent ideologues, were right all along.

I underestimated the republicans. I wrongly assumed that behind the scenes they would still put competent people into key position needed for good governance. That even though they voiced a horribly flawed view of government they would still act in the interests of the American people. I never thought they took all their own rhetoric seriously.

Again, I was wrong. I ask for your forgiveness.

I imagined that many many good hearted, smart people who call themselves republicans (and democrats) would moderate the more extreme visions of the Bush administration and would stand up to his more dunderheaded ideas.

I thought common sense would act as a buffer.

The Iraq invasion shook my faith in common sense. Not only could a politician be so blindingly wrong, he could get away with it by banking on partisan loyalty and fear.

But in my own self-defense, I wasn't so naive this last election. I was willing to pull behind Kerry, a man with a clue or two about how a government should be run, simply because I had seen the alternative. I wasn't a big fan of Kerry, a compromise candidate, but I was scared of another Bush term.

I was right about that. The second Bush term has been just as bad as the first, and there's still lots more to come...

|
fill er up
 






I took this picture back in March of 2004 to show how high the gas prices were at the time. I guess they don't seem so bad right now.

|
9.05.2005
say it better than me
 
What about the basic simple process of governing?

Michael Berube

Modern Republicans have left all that behind. They don’t like government; they want, in Lovable Furry Old Grover Norquist’s famous words, to shrink government to the size at which it can be drowned in the bathtub. Consequently, when they get into government, they quickly fill its halls with two kinds of people: people who are charged with the task of destroying the agencies they run, and people who have no idea whatsoever about how their agencies work. (Reagan set the template: James Watt at Interior, Clarence Thomas at the EEOC, Anne Gorsuch at EPA, among the destroyers; Samuel Pierce at HUD, among the no-idea-whatsoevers. FEMA gets the latter group.) So your modern Republicans don’t do disaster management. In fact, there’s a lot of things they don’t do anymore. Basically, they’re down to two things: one wing retools the tax code so as to redistribute wealth to their friends and cronies in the top .001 of American society, and the other wing works to expel gays and lesbians from the body politic. That’s about it.


George W. Bush is the Incompetant in Chief who never holds anyone accountable for anything that goes wrong. I'm not certain of this, but I can't recall anyone in the higher positions of government who got fired for not preventing 9-11 or for pushing false evidence before the Iraq invasion.

I think everyone involved got medals...

Amanda Marcotte @ Pandagon:

It's a strategy we all know--given a responsibility you don't want, one way to get out of it is to fuck it up so badly no one ever asks you to do it again. Basically, the Norquistian theory that the federal government can't do anything right became a self-fulfilling prophecy. From that viewpoint, FEMA's failure to evacuate New Orleans before the hurricane and their failure to respond quickly in order to save lives afterward went pretty much according to plan--I have little doubt that the spinmeisters are working on a way right this minute to use this as leverage to make the argument that asking for help from the federal government will fail you every time, not just when a bunch of heartless incompetents are in charge.


|
9.03.2005
that moment never comes
 
I keep waiting for that lightbulb moment. When people might finally realize that a dangerous ideology has become a political reality in this country.

During the Clinton years millions of dollars flooded into creating a conservative network; a giant teat for conservatives to feed, that pushed a pro-business, anti-government message.

(Apparently, taking government handouts make you feeble-minded, while sitting pretty at a think tank funded by wealthy donors makes you a free market revolutionary?)

And people bought this crap? This was written back in 1997:

Rather than a triumph of good management, FEMA has simply been converted into a political cotton-candy operation-and is working overtime to turn the American people and local governments into federal dependents.


Read that again.

The how dare people expect the government to do anything useful for them indignation is so palpable. The very idea of a federal government has become symbolic of tyranny and oppression. In response to the excess of the soviet era, conservatives have decided that it would be best for everyone involved if we took the power of self government out of the hands of the (poor) people.

"What?" My few conservative readers might be asking, "We're about freeing people, not taking away their choices!"

But yes you are.

Why else would you want to strip the government of the means to provide services that people may, through their representatives, ask it to perform?


Because its not in the constitution!!!


Because people might ask the government to address a grievance, the government may act, people might like it, and they'll ask for more?

That must be stopped.

People must not be allowed to use government to improve their situation. Because we all know what would happen, millions of poor people would decide to use the power of government taxation to improve their own circumstances. They might decide that everyone deserves the right to stay healthy without being screwed up the ass by insurance companies. They might decide that prescription drugs should be affordable. They might decide that companies should be held liable for the crimes they commit against people and the environment. They might decide that transportation should be affordable and not subject to the whims of giant oil companies. They might decide that people deserve a fair compensation for the work they perform.

How dare they!

We all know that this is backwards. We know the rich use the power of government taxation for their own benefit. They've realized what is obvious to anyone who bothers to look; that government can be of an enormous collective benefit to the people that control it.

(Amazing that the government only needs to be small when it comes to helping people, but can be a huge bloated handout machine when it comes to helping the largest corporation in the world.)

So instead of good healthcare we get an overproduction of weapons. Instead of a well prepared response to natural disasters we get a fool's war to secure oil resources.

Small government conservatives are a bunch of tools. Quite literally. The goals of the corporate funded war against government are twofold; to protect the enormous profit generating enterprises that would go down in flames without the support and protection of the government, and to restrict freedom to only those that can afford to buy it.

Take some personal responsibility!!

Protein Wisdom:

To blame the resultant chaos in the immediate aftermath on the Bushies is to argue implicitly that you expect your federal government to act as a surrogate parent, not as a smaller, hands off federal entity that defers power to local governments.


Let's rephrase that shall we? Maybe people expected the federal government to act as an entity responsible for the health and safety of the nation's citizens?

How did so many people get the misguided notion that our very own government might be responsible for such a thing?

Not our job, say the conservatives running the country. We got rid of all that shit to pay for that big ass tax cut.

Flash back to 1997 when this movement was still gaining steam:

FEMA's expansion symbolizes the proliferation of acceptable political pretexts for one citizen to stick his hand in another citizen's pocket. FEMA's popularity is one more sign of the decline of individual responsibility-or even a semblance of respect for such responsibility-in American political culture.


When small government conservatives talk about "personal responsibility", they are saying that only people who can afford life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness deserve it. The rest should just learn to suck it up or die. Its all very coded to appeal to the fear of well off people who fear that the masses of poor might rise up and take all their cool stuff.

The rich deserve what they have because they are better, the poor must be stupid, lazy and criminal?

If you can only afford to live in an area prone to flooding, you deserve to be trapped without food and water for days.

If you can't afford a car and rely on public transportation, you deserve to be treated like cattle in the aftermath of a hurricane.

If you can't afford to have health insurance, you deserve to suffer and die from a preventable illness.


... and hat's off to Kanye West, ballsy!

|
9.01.2005
more hateful words
 
WorldNut Daily

"'Let us pray for those ravaged by this disaster. However, we must not forget that the citizens of New Orleans tolerated and welcomed the wickedness in their city for so long,' Marcavage said. 'May this act of God cause us all to think about what we tolerate in our city limits, and bring us trembling before the throne of Almighty God.'"


god hates gay people so much he's willing to kill us all just to prove it?

The political left in America has never been able to overcome its touchy-queasy aversion to all things God. Make that the Judeo-Christian God. The occult is fine. Islam is fine. Buddha is fine. In fact, anything but the Bible God is fine. Well, as the pictures coming out of New Orleans demonstrate, there is a real-life price to be paid for America's failure to teach the rules of the social contract. Unfortunately, the bill often comes due at the most inconvenient time. And it's not always payable in money alone.


god showed those poor black people?

|
new groove
 
"'I don't think anyone anticipated the breach of the levees.'" - George W. Bush on Sept. 1, 2005

anyone = anyone in this incompetent administration. They refuse to listen to anyone thats been targeted as a political enemy, and that includes much of the academic and professional world.


|

About Me

bruce
35 yr old
Married
Okie
Highlands Ranch
Denver
Colorado
Student
Recording Engineer
Gemini
Arrogant
Voted for Kerry
Voted for Obama
Scumbag
Narrow-minded
Liberal
Uncle
Smug
Hypocrite
Philosophical Type
Taken
Omicron Male
Feminist Friendly
22.3% Less Smart
Whacko
Rabbit



Any Box

email

Barack Obama Logo
Get Firefox!




Dissolve into Evergreens