Dissolve into Evergreens
This blog used to be about politics. Not so much anymore as I have worked through my fascination with that subject. It now seems appropriate that with a new president and the end of the Bush nightmare that I move on to new subjects that are more in line with my current interests. I may still occasionally express an opinion about political matters but for the most part I will be commenting on music, photography and personal observations. Thank you for reading.


Current Playlist

Top 100 in iTunes

juscuz's Last.fm Overall Artists 

Chart




Atom Site Feed

B4 d- t k s u- f i- o x-- e- l- c+

Blogarama


< ? Colorado Blogs # >

« - ? Blog Oklahoma * # + »
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
10.10.2004
All Your Dreams Made True
 
Bush Drives The Nation Towards Bankruptcy:

From the American Conservative:

"Under his administration, the national debt has gone up a stunning 24 percent, to $7 trillion. A chief reason for that increase is that Bush has enthusiastically promoted an explosion in government spending. In 2004, federal government outlays are expected to exceed $2.3 trillion, which is $500 billion more than in 2000. At nearly $500 billion, the budget deficit is close to 4.5 percent of gross domestic product, the sort of ratio usually seen in developing countries that are about to implode. Contrary to the White House's absurd projections, private economists expect annual deficits of between $400 billion and $600 billion over the next 10 years."


oooo.. and a nifty chart as well.



Mr. Bush, when the lines go up that means spending has increased.

Rob from Emphasis Added asks the question I've been wondering myself.

As we come down the home stretch of this campaign, Republicans should look to Bush and soberly assess where he stands on the issues that define the Party:

* Fiscal responsibility
* Limited power of government over citizens
* Federalism
* Realistic foreign policy in the tradition of Dulles, Kissinger, Baker and Bush senior
* “Good government” and limitations of abuse of power by legislators and the executive branch
* Aggrandizement of American influence in the world
* Free trade


So when Bush says : "Non-homeland, non-defense discretionary spending was raising at 15 percent a year when I got into office. And today it's less than 1 percent, because we're working together to try to bring this deficit under control."

.. and its simply not true, what do we have? Well, I like what David Neiwert says about "Movement Conservatism".

Its whole purpose being the acquisition of raw power through any means necessary, the discrete "conservative movement" and its dealings can at times be extremely disorienting. The proliferation of Newspeak as a political propaganda strategy by the American right, in particular, has created a milieu in which up is down, wrong is right and ignorance is strength.

At times, is seems as if factuality has no real basis. Truth has no objective value; it is instead a mutable thing, readily manipulated through repetition of propaganda talking points.


Modern day movement conservatives follow Bush because he represents a path to power, not because Bush represents any kind of idealogical consistency. I find it disturbing when a Bush supporter says that they "support small government and lower taxes" when its blindingly obvious that Bush has not made any attempt to reign in spending under his watch. This, despite having party control over both houses.

MC's get on the Bush Bandwagon for a limited numbder of reasons. Most important are the wedge issues: abortion, religion, gay marriage and gun rights (to name a few). You can see how important thes votes are to Bush by the way that he pushes these issue to the fore; by supporting a completely unnecessary constitutional amendment banning gay marrrige, or fighting embryonic stem cell research.

I can understand wedge issue voters. Its a means to an end. You will vote for an immoral man with a track record of deception because you believe that your goals will be met.

If there's a phrase that sums up the mental attitude of the movement conservatives its "the ends justifies the means".

So what if Bush has to lie to the American people if it means geopolitical advantage, or the outlaw of abortions, or loosing the restriction on gun ownership?

Saddle up that pony... let's ride.

Its cynical, I can understand. Is it not what I am doing by voting for Kerry. The ends: defeating Bush, the means: voting Kerry/Edwards? (Realizing of course there is no way that Bush will lose Oklahoma)

The second faction of the MC's are the corporate bosses. They support Bush because they feel he will deliver the goods, and he has. Tax cuts targeted at high income earners, and people with investment wealth and looser regulations from the government. Agood number of people will go to the polls on November 2 and vote to put a little cash in their pocket... short term.

Long term, this current course only leads to disaster.

There are two converging realities that MC's are choosing to ignore:

1) You can't keep spending and borrowing without either raising taxes or going into a period of runaway inflation.

and...

2) You can't maintain a foreign policy of "keeping on the offense" without drastically increasing the number of troops in the military.

Its all about short term thinking. Get power now. The reality is though that each faction of the conservative movement expects to have their ends met once power is obtained. But that is a misreading of the real agenda.

The real agenda is the acquisition of power.

Why would yuo ever give people what they want when they are voting for you to get what they want? Its political suicide to take away your own wedge issues.

The conservative movement is entirely based on undoing the "evils" perptrated on us by the "liberals" But now with the presidency and both houses under their control.. what do they do? Squat.

Some tax cuts that will "be made permanent" if we re-elect Bush.
A partial birth abortion ban that will be struck down, so we better elect Bush to get some new judges in there!

But this is the nature of politics. IN a few years, if not already we will be marching to the polls to rectify the ills of "conservatism".

back and forth we go...

|
Comments: Post a Comment

About Me

bruce
35 yr old
Married
Okie
Highlands Ranch
Denver
Colorado
Student
Recording Engineer
Gemini
Arrogant
Voted for Kerry
Voted for Obama
Scumbag
Narrow-minded
Liberal
Uncle
Smug
Hypocrite
Philosophical Type
Taken
Omicron Male
Feminist Friendly
22.3% Less Smart
Whacko
Rabbit



Any Box

email

Barack Obama Logo
Get Firefox!




Dissolve into Evergreens