Dissolve into Evergreens
This blog used to be about politics. Not so much anymore as I have worked through my fascination with that subject. It now seems appropriate that with a new president and the end of the Bush nightmare that I move on to new subjects that are more in line with my current interests. I may still occasionally express an opinion about political matters but for the most part I will be commenting on music, photography and personal observations. Thank you for reading.


Current Playlist

Top 100 in iTunes

juscuz's Last.fm Overall Artists 

Chart




Atom Site Feed

B4 d- t k s u- f i- o x-- e- l- c+

Blogarama


< ? Colorado Blogs # >

« - ? Blog Oklahoma * # + »
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
7.22.2003
 
They Came for the Blue Collar Workers and I Didn't Say a Thing

I.B.M. Explores Shift of White-Collar Jobs Overseas:
"'Increased global trade was supposed to lead to better jobs and higher standards of living,' said Donald A. Manzullo, an Illinois Republican who is the committee chairman. 'The assumption was that while lower-skilled jobs would be done elsewhere, it would allow Americans to focus on higher-skilled, higher-paying opportunities. But what do you tell the Ph.D., or professional engineer, or architect, or accountant, or computer scientist to do next? Where do you tell them to go?'"


Well, first you tell them what a gullible idiot you were to believe that line of crap they sold you. Next, you apologize to all the people that pointed this obvious eventuality out but you insisted on calling them "flat earthers" or whatever passed for name calling at the time. Next you start to do your elected duty, to look after the interests of the companies er, I mean people that elected you.

Echoing the consensus of a few years ago: @Slashdot:

It's time to wake up people. Being able to sling a little code, set up a webserver and talk your way around a design meeting is not going to cut it anymore. You need to get off your ass, put the time in on the weekends and:

1) Identify what it is that you can do that cannot be done by anyone else (or at least, anyone who is willing to work for your salary)

2) Train yourself to do it well.


...and the inevitable response, and the new consensus: also from Slashdot:

Make yourself more valuable than those Indian workers by being willing to work 60 hours a week for the same salary

Then of course they don't want to lose their jobs, so they will make themselves more valuable by deciding to work 80 hours a week for the same salary.

And since you have to eat and can't afford to lose your job either, you decide to work 80 hours a week, but now you are willing to work for 80% of your original salary.

But they can't afford to lose their jobs either, so they will work 80 hours for 50% of your original salary and forego all company benefits.

You and your co-workers proclaim that this is not a living wage and that you hardly see your kids anymore, so the company fires its US workforce and moves operations to India, but continues to offer unpaid internships in the more expensive labor markets like yours. Naturally you take one of these unpaid internships so that while you are "looking for a job" you will at least be "gaining new skills".

And fourteen months into your unpaid internship, you see that taxes on the CEO have been lowered and he how has a little windfall in addition to that $44 million salary and bonuses for increasing profits. He uses his windfall to buy a yacht.


What you find is that there is nothing unique about American workers that cannot be duplicated by forign workers in lower cost areas. The only safe job is one tied to a location. And even then, people can be moved. What DOES make the U.S. unique is our rights and protections for workers that has, until now afforded even the lowliest of workers a modest (and livable) wage, as well as safe and clean working conditions. At the core of this issue is the company's desire to escape this responsibility for the livelyhoods of its workers and return to the early part of the 20th century. But why should we allow companies to sell their products produced by labor which we, or our fathers, mothers or children would not subject to?

This is classic as well: NYT article:
In the hourlong I.B.M. conference call, which took place in March, the company's executives were particularly worried that the trend could spur unionization efforts.

"Governments are going to find that they're fairly limited as to what they can do, so unionizing becomes an attractive option," Mr. Lynch said on the recording. "You can see some of the fairly appealing arguments they're making as to why employees need to do some things like organizing to help fight this."

The I.B.M. executives also warned that when workers from China come to the United States to learn to do technology jobs now being done here, some American employees might grow enraged about being forced to train the foreign workers who might ultimately take away their jobs.


you think, gee whiz. Go read the NYT article!


|

About Me

bruce
35 yr old
Married
Okie
Highlands Ranch
Denver
Colorado
Student
Recording Engineer
Gemini
Arrogant
Voted for Kerry
Voted for Obama
Scumbag
Narrow-minded
Liberal
Uncle
Smug
Hypocrite
Philosophical Type
Taken
Omicron Male
Feminist Friendly
22.3% Less Smart
Whacko
Rabbit



Any Box

email

Barack Obama Logo
Get Firefox!




Dissolve into Evergreens